Simulation studies typically involve the following workflow (Morris, White, & Crowther, 2019):

- Create an experimental design.
- Generate a dataset.
- Run statistical methods on the dataset.
- Run steps 2 and 3 many times, then summarize the performance of the statistical methods and calculate MCSE.
- Repeat step 4 for every set of conditions in the experimental design.
- Evaluate the overall results.

The flowchart below depicts the workflow. The chart is created using
`grViz()`

from the `DiagrammeR`

package (Iannone, 2020).

The explanation of the workflow in this vignette follow notes from Dr. James Pustejovsky’s Data Analysis, Simulation and Programming in R course (Spring, 2019).

```
library(simhelpers)
library(dplyr)
library(tibble)
library(purrr)
library(tidyr)
library(knitr)
library(kableExtra)
library(broom)
library(ggplot2)
```

Before we begin working on the simulation study, we should decide what model and design parameters we want to vary. Parameters can include sample size, proportion of missing data etc.

The data-generating function below takes in model parameters. For example, we can generate data varying the sample size or level of heteroskedasticity or the amount of missingness. Below is a skeleton of the data-generating function. The arguments are any data-generating parameters that we would want to vary.

Below is an example where we generate random normal data for two
groups, where the second group has a standard deviation twice as large
as that of the first group. The function takes in three arguments:
`n1`

, indicating sample size for Group 1, `n2`

indicating sample size for Group 2, and `mean_diff`

,
indicating the mean difference.

```
generate_dat <- function(n1, n2, mean_diff){
dat <- tibble(
y = c(rnorm(n = n1, mean_diff, 1), # mean diff as mean, sd 1
rnorm(n = n2, 0, 2)), # mean 0, sd 2
group = c(rep("Group 1", n1), rep("Group 2", n2))
)
return(dat)
}
```

After creating the data-generating function, we should check whether
it works. Below, we generate an example dataset with 10,000 people in
each group and the `mean_diff`

set to 1.

```
set.seed(2020143)
example_dat <- generate_dat(n1 = 10000, n2= 10000, mean_diff = 1)
example_dat %>%
head()
#> # A tibble: 6 × 2
#> y group
#> <dbl> <chr>
#> 1 0.491 Group 1
#> 2 -0.534 Group 1
#> 3 1.02 Group 1
#> 4 0.754 Group 1
#> 5 0.762 Group 1
#> 6 0.979 Group 1
```

Below, we create a summary table. The mean of the outcome for Group 1 is close to 1 and the mean for Group 2 is close to 0. The standard deviation of the outcome for Group 1 is close to 1 and the standard deviation for Group 2 is close to 2. The table matches what we specified in the data-generating model.

```
example_dat %>%
group_by(group) %>%
summarize(n = n(),
M = mean(y),
SD = sd(y)) %>%
kable(digits = 3)
```

group | n | M | SD |
---|---|---|---|

Group 1 | 10000 | 0.998 | 0.996 |

Group 2 | 10000 | -0.014 | 2.028 |

Below we create a density plot of the values that we generated for each of the groups. The distributions seem normal. The peaks seem to have a difference of 1. And, the variances of the outcome scores are different for each group as we specified.

In this step, we run some statistical methods to calculate test statistics, regression coefficients, p-values, or confidence intervals. The function takes in the data and any design parameters, such as options for how estimation should be carried out (e.g., use HC0 standard errors or HC2 standard errors).

Below is an example function that runs t-tests on a simulated
dataset. The function runs a conventional t-test, which assumes
homogeneity of variance, and a Welch t-test, which does not assume that
the population variances of the outcome for the two groups are equal.
The function returns a tibble containing the names of the two methods,
mean difference estimates, p-values, and upper and lower bounds of the
confidence intervals. We could use the `t.test()`

function to
extract everything we need. This function implements the calculations
directly (using sample statistics) mostly just for fun. A further reason
is that the `t.test()`

function does a lot of extra stuff to
handle contingencies that come up with real data (like missing
observations), but which are unnecessary when running calculations with
simulated data.

```
# t and p value
calc_t <- function(est, vd, df, method){
se <- sqrt(vd) # standard error
t <- est / se # t-test
p_val <- 2 * pt(-abs(t), df = df) # p value
ci <- est + c(-1, 1) * qt(.975, df = df) * se # confidence interval
res <- tibble(method = method, est = est, p_val = p_val,
lower_bound = ci[1], upper_bound = ci[2])
return(res)
}
estimate <- function(dat, n1, n2){
# calculate summary stats
means <- tapply(dat$y, dat$group, mean)
vars <- tapply(dat$y, dat$group, var)
# calculate summary stats
est <- means[1] - means[2] # mean diff
var_1 <- vars[1] # var for group 1
var_2 <- vars[2] # var for group 2
# conventional t-test
dft <- n1 + n2 - 2 # degrees of freedom
sp_sq <- ((n1 - 1) * var_1 + (n2 - 1) * var_2) / dft # pooled var
vdt <- sp_sq * (1 / n1 + 1 / n2) # variance of estimate
# welch t-test
dfw <- (var_1 / n1 + var_2 / n2)^2 / (((1 / (n1 - 1)) * (var_1 / n1)^2) + ((1 / (n2 - 1)) * (var_2 / n2)^2)) # degrees of freedom
vdw <- var_1 / n1 + var_2 / n2 # variance of estimate
results <- bind_rows(calc_t(est = est, vd = vdt, df = dft, method = "t-test"),
calc_t(est = est, vd = vdw, df = dfw, method = "Welch t-test"))
return(results)
}
```

Here again, it would be good to check if the function runs as it
should. Below we run the `estimate()`

function on the example
dataset:

```
est_res <-
estimate(example_dat, n1 = 10000, n2 = 10000) %>%
mutate_if(is.numeric, round, 5)
est_res
#> # A tibble: 2 × 5
#> method est p_val lower_bound upper_bound
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 t-test 1.01 0 0.967 1.06
#> 2 Welch t-test 1.01 0 0.967 1.06
```

We can compare the results to those from the built-in
`t.test()`

function:

```
t_res <-
bind_rows(
tidy(t.test(y ~ group, data = example_dat, var.equal = TRUE)),
tidy(t.test(y ~ group, data = example_dat))
) %>%
mutate(
estimate = estimate1 - estimate2,
method = c("t-test", "Welch t-test")
) %>%
select(method, est = estimate, p_val = p.value, lower_bound = conf.low, upper_bound = conf.high) %>%
mutate_if(is.numeric, round, 5)
t_res
#> # A tibble: 2 × 5
#> method est p_val lower_bound upper_bound
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 t-test 1.01 0 0.967 1.06
#> 2 Welch t-test 1.01 0 0.967 1.06
```

The values match.

If we were to estimate complicated models, like structural equation
modeling or hierarchical linear modeling, there may be cases where the
model does not converge. To handle such cases, we can add an
`if...else`

statement within the `estimate()`

function that evaluates whether the model converged and if it did not
converge, the statement outputs `NA`

values for estimates,
p-values etc.

```
estimate <- function(dat, design_parameters){
# write estimation models here
# e.g., fit_mimic <- lavaan::cfa(...)
# convergence
if(fit_mimic@optim$converged == FALSE){ # this syntax will depend on how the specific model stores convergence
res <- tibble(method = method, est = NA, p_val = NA,
lower_bound = NA, upper_bound = NA)
} else{
res <- tibble(method = method, est = est, p_val = p_val,
lower_bound = ci[1], upper_bound = ci[2])
}
return(res)
}
```

In this step, we create a function to calculate performance measures based on results that we extracted from the estimation step, repeated across many replications. As the skeleton below indicates, a performance summary function takes in the results, along with any model parameters, and returns a dataset of performance measures.

The function below fills in the `calc_performance()`

function. We use the `calc_rejection()`

function in the
`simhelpers`

package to calculate rejection rates.

The following code chunk sets up the simulation driver. The arguments specify the number of iterations for the simulation and any parameters needed to run the data-generating and estimating functions. The function then generates many sets of results by repeating the data-generating step and estimation step. Finally, the function calculates the performance measures and returns results for this set of parameters.

```
run_sim <- function(iterations, model_params, design_params, seed = NULL) {
if (!is.null(seed)) set.seed(seed)
results <-
map_dfr(1:iterations, ~ {
dat <- generate_dat(model_params)
estimate(dat, design_params)
})
calc_performance(results, model_params)
}
```

Below is the driver for our example simulation study:

Now that we have all our functions in order, we can specify the exact
factors we want to manipulate in the study. The following code chunk
creates a list of design factors and uses the `expand_grid()`

function from `tidyr`

package to
create every combination of the factor levels. We also set the number of
iterations and the seed that will be used when generating data (Wickham et al., 2019).

```
set.seed(20150316) # change this seed value!
# now express the simulation parameters as vectors/lists
design_factors <- list(factor1 = , factor2 = , ...) # combine into a design set
params <-
tidyr::expand_grid(!!!design_factors) %>%
mutate(
iterations = 1000, # change this to how many ever iterations
seed = round(runif(1) * 2^30) + 1:n()
)
# All look right?
lengths(design_factors)
nrow(params)
head(params)
```

The code below specifies three design factors: `n1`

, which
specifies the sample size for Group 1, `n2`

, which specifies
the sample size for Group 2, and `mean_diff`

, which denotes
the mean difference between two groups on an outcome. These are the
between simulation factors. The within-simulation factor is the t-test
method with one assuming equal variance and one not assuming equal
variance.

```
set.seed(20200110)
# now express the simulation parameters as vectors/lists
design_factors <- list(
n1 = 50,
n2 = c(50, 70),
mean_diff = c(0, .5, 1, 2)
)
params <-
tidyr::expand_grid(!!!design_factors) %>%
mutate(
iterations = 1000,
seed = round(runif(1) * 2^30) + 1:n()
)
# All look right?
lengths(design_factors)
#> n1 n2 mean_diff
#> 1 2 4
nrow(params)
#> [1] 8
head(params)
#> # A tibble: 6 × 5
#> n1 n2 mean_diff iterations seed
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 50 50 0 1000 204809087
#> 2 50 50 0.5 1000 204809088
#> 3 50 50 1 1000 204809089
#> 4 50 50 2 1000 204809090
#> 5 50 70 0 1000 204809091
#> 6 50 70 0.5 1000 204809092
```

Here we run the simulation using `purrr`

package serial
workflow. We use the `pmap()`

function from `purrr`

to run the `run_sim()`

function on each condition specified in `params`

.

```
system.time(
results <-
params %>%
mutate(
res = pmap(., .f = run_sim)
) %>%
unnest(cols = res)
)
#> user system elapsed
#> 37.306 0.205 37.968
results %>%
kable()
```

n1 | n2 | mean_diff | iterations | seed | method | K_rejection | rej_rate | rej_rate_mcse |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

50 | 50 | 0.0 | 1000 | 204809087 | Welch t-test | 1000 | 0.047 | 0.0066926 |

50 | 50 | 0.0 | 1000 | 204809087 | t-test | 1000 | 0.048 | 0.0067599 |

50 | 50 | 0.5 | 1000 | 204809088 | Welch t-test | 1000 | 0.358 | 0.0151603 |

50 | 50 | 0.5 | 1000 | 204809088 | t-test | 1000 | 0.362 | 0.0151972 |

50 | 50 | 1.0 | 1000 | 204809089 | Welch t-test | 1000 | 0.860 | 0.0109727 |

50 | 50 | 1.0 | 1000 | 204809089 | t-test | 1000 | 0.861 | 0.0109398 |

50 | 50 | 2.0 | 1000 | 204809090 | Welch t-test | 1000 | 1.000 | 0.0000000 |

50 | 50 | 2.0 | 1000 | 204809090 | t-test | 1000 | 1.000 | 0.0000000 |

50 | 70 | 0.0 | 1000 | 204809091 | Welch t-test | 1000 | 0.050 | 0.0068920 |

50 | 70 | 0.0 | 1000 | 204809091 | t-test | 1000 | 0.028 | 0.0052169 |

50 | 70 | 0.5 | 1000 | 204809092 | Welch t-test | 1000 | 0.416 | 0.0155867 |

50 | 70 | 0.5 | 1000 | 204809092 | t-test | 1000 | 0.339 | 0.0149693 |

50 | 70 | 1.0 | 1000 | 204809093 | Welch t-test | 1000 | 0.941 | 0.0074511 |

50 | 70 | 1.0 | 1000 | 204809093 | t-test | 1000 | 0.906 | 0.0092284 |

50 | 70 | 2.0 | 1000 | 204809094 | Welch t-test | 1000 | 1.000 | 0.0000000 |

50 | 70 | 2.0 | 1000 | 204809094 | t-test | 1000 | 1.000 | 0.0000000 |

Below we use the `future`

and the `furrr`

packages to run the simulation in parallel (Bengtsson, 2020; Vaughan & Dancho, 2018).
These packages are designed to work with functions from the
`purrr`

package. The line below gets a cluster set up on your
computer or network. For more complicated network setups, please see the
documentation
for the future package.

Once the cluster is configured, we can just replace `pmap()`

from `purrr`

with `future_pmap()`

to run the simulation in parallel.

```
library(future)
library(furrr)
plan(multisession) # choose an appropriate plan from the future package
system.time(
results <-
params %>%
mutate(res = future_pmap(., .f = run_sim)) %>%
unnest(cols = res)
)
```

In the `simhelpers`

package, we have a function,
`evaluate_by_row()`

, that implements this `furrr`

workflow automatically:

The `create_skeleton()`

function from our
`simhelpers`

package will open an untitled .R file with an
outline or skeleton of functions needed to run a simulation study.

Bengtsson, H. (2020). *Future: Unified parallel and distributed
processing in r for everyone*. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=future

Iannone, R. (2020). *DiagrammeR: Graph/network visualization*.
Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DiagrammeR

Morris, T. P., White, I. R., & Crowther, M. J. (2019). Using
simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. *Statistics in
Medicine*, *38*(11), 2074–2102.

Vaughan, D., & Dancho, M. (2018). *Furrr: Apply mapping functions
in parallel using futures*. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=furrr

Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D.,
François, R., … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. *Journal of Open Source
Software*, *4*(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686