vtreat
is a data.frame
processor/conditioner (available for R
, and
for
Python
) that prepares real-world data for supervised
machine learning or predictive modeling in a statistically sound
manner.
A nice video lecture on what sorts of problems vtreat
solves can be found here.
vtreat
takes an input data.frame
that has a
specified column called “the outcome variable” (or “y”) that is the
quantity to be predicted (and must not have missing values). Other input
columns are possible explanatory variables (typically numeric or
categorical/string-valued, these columns may have missing values) that
the user later wants to use to predict “y”. In practice such an input
data.frame
may not be immediately suitable for machine
learning procedures that often expect only numeric explanatory
variables, and may not tolerate missing values.
To solve this, vtreat
builds a transformed
data.frame
where all explanatory variable columns have been
transformed into a number of numeric explanatory variable columns,
without missing values. The vtreat
implementation produces
derived numeric columns that capture most of the information relating
the explanatory columns to the specified “y” or dependent/outcome column
through a number of numeric transforms (indicator variables, impact
codes, prevalence codes, and more). This transformed
data.frame
is suitable for a wide range of supervised
learning methods from linear regression, through gradient boosted
machines.
The idea is: you can take a data.frame
of messy real
world data and easily, faithfully, reliably, and repeatably prepare it
for machine learning using documented methods using vtreat
.
Incorporating vtreat
into your machine learning workflow
lets you quickly work with very diverse structured data.
In all cases (classification, regression, unsupervised, and
multinomial classification) the intent is that vtreat
transforms are essentially one liners.
The preparation commands are organized as follows:
R
regression example, fit/prepare interface, R
regression example, design/prepare/experiment interface, Python
regression example.R
classification example, fit/prepare interface, R
classification example, design/prepare/experiment interface, Python
classification example.R
unsupervised example, fit/prepare interface, R
unsupervised example, design/prepare/experiment interface, Python
unsupervised example.R
multinomial classification example, fit/prepare interface, R
multinomial classification example, design/prepare/experiment
interface, Python
multinomial classification example.In all cases: variable preparation is intended to be a “one liner.”
These current revisions of the examples are designed to be small, yet complete. So as a set they have some overlap, but the user can rely mostly on a single example for a single task type.
For more detail please see here: arXiv:1611.09477 stat.AP
(the documentation describes the R
version, however all of
the examples can be found worked in Python
here).
vtreat
is available as an R
package,
and also as a Python
/Pandas
package.
(logo: Julie Mount, source: “The Harvest” by Boris Kustodiev 1914)
Even with modern machine learning techniques (random forests, support vector machines, neural nets, gradient boosted trees, and so on) or standard statistical methods (regression, generalized regression, generalized additive models) there are common data issues that can cause modeling to fail. vtreat deals with a number of these in a principled and automated fashion.
In particular vtreat emphasizes a concept called “y-aware pre-processing” and implements:
scale
argument to
vtreat::prepare()
, using some of the ideas discussed here).
This allows correct/sensible application of principal component analysis
pre-processing in a machine learning context.The idea is: even with a sophisticated machine learning algorithm there are many ways messy real world data can defeat the modeling process, and vtreat helps with at least ten of them. We emphasize: these problems are already in your data, you simply build better and more reliable models if you attempt to mitigate them. Automated processing is no substitute for actually looking at the data, but vtreat supplies efficient, reliable, documented, and tested implementations of many of the commonly needed transforms.
To help explain the methods we have prepared some documentation:
Data treatments are “y-aware” (use distribution relations between
independent variables and the dependent variable). For binary
classification use designTreatmentsC()
and for numeric
regression use designTreatmentsN()
.
After the design step, prepare()
should be used as you
would use model.matrix. prepare()
treated variables are all
numeric and never take the value NA or +-Inf (so are very safe to use in
modeling).
In application we suggest splitting your data into three sets: one for building vtreat encodings, one for training models using these encodings, and one for test and model evaluation.
The purpose of vtreat
library is to reliably prepare
data for supervised machine learning. We try to leave as much as
possible to the machine learning algorithms themselves, but cover most
of the truly necessary typically ignored precautions. The library is
designed to produce a data.frame
that is entirely numeric
and takes common precautions to guard against the following real world
data issues:
Categorical variables with very many levels.
We re-encode such variables as a family of indicator or dummy
variables for common levels plus an additional impact
code (also called “effects coded”). This allows principled use
(including smoothing) of huge categorical variables (like zip-codes)
when building models. This is critical for some libraries (such as
randomForest
, which has hard limits on the number of
allowed levels).
Rare categorical levels.
Levels that do not occur often during training tend not to have
reliable effect estimates and contribute to over-fit. vtreat helps with
2 precautions in this case. First the rareLevel
argument
suppresses levels with this count our below from modeling, except
possibly through a grouped contribution. Also with enough data vtreat
attempts to estimate out of sample performance of derived variables.
Finally we suggest users reserve a portion of data for vtreat design,
separate from any data used in additional training, calibration, or
testing.
Novel categorical levels.
A common problem in deploying a classifier to production is: new levels (levels not seen during training) encountered during model application. We deal with this by encoding categorical variables in a possibly redundant manner: reserving a dummy variable for all levels (not the more common all but a reference level scheme). This is in fact the correct representation for regularized modeling techniques and lets us code novel levels as all dummies simultaneously zero (which is a reasonable thing to try). This encoding while limited is cheaper than the fully Bayesian solution of computing a weighted sum over previously seen levels during model application.
Missing/invalid values NA, NaN, +-Inf.
Variables with these issues are re-coded as two columns. The first
column is clean copy of the variable (with missing/invalid values
replaced with either zero or the grand mean, depending on the user chose
of the scale
parameter). The second column is a dummy or
indicator that marks if the replacement has been performed. This is
simpler than imputation of missing values, and allows the downstream
model to attempt to use missingness as a useful signal (which it often
is in industrial data).
Extreme values.
Variables can be restricted to stay in ranges seen during training. This can defend against some run-away classifier issues during model application.
Constant and near-constant variables.
Variables that “don’t vary” or “nearly don’t vary” are suppressed.
Need for estimated single-variable model effect sizes and significances.
It is a dirty secret that even popular machine learning techniques need some variable pruning (when exposed to very wide data frames, see here and here). We make the necessary effect size estimates and significances easily available and supply initial variable pruning.
The above are all awful things that often lurk in real world data.
Automating these steps ensures they are easy enough that you actually
perform them and leaves the analyst time to look for additional data
issues. For example this allowed us to essentially automate a number of
the steps taught in chapters 4 and 6 of Practical
Data Science with R (Zumel, Mount; Manning 2014) into a very short
worksheet (though we think for understanding it is
essential to work all the steps by hand as we did in the book).
The 2nd edition of Practical Data Science with R covers using
vtreat
in R
in chapter 8 “Advanced Data
Preparation.”
The idea is: data.frame
s prepared with the
vtreat
library are somewhat safe to train on as some
precaution has been taken against all of the above issues. Also of
interest are the vtreat
variable significances (help in
initial variable pruning, a necessity when there are a large number of
columns) and vtreat::prepare(scale=TRUE)
which re-encodes
all variables into effect units making them suitable for y-aware
dimension reduction (variable clustering, or principal component
analysis) and for geometry sensitive machine learning techniques
(k-means, knn, linear SVM, and more). You may want to do more than the
vtreat
library does (such as Bayesian imputation, variable
clustering, and more) but you certainly do not want to do less.
There have been a number of recent substantial improvements to the library, including:
parallel
.Some of our related articles (which should make clear some of our motivations, and design decisions):
Examples of current best practice using vtreat
(variable
coding, train, test split) can be found here
and here.
Some small examples:
We attach our packages.
library("vtreat")
# Loading required package: wrapr
packageVersion("vtreat")
# [1] '1.6.5'
citation('vtreat')
# To cite package 'vtreat' in publications use:
#
# Mount J, Zumel N (2024). _vtreat: A Statistically Sound 'data.frame'
# Processor/Conditioner_. https://github.com/WinVector/vtreat/,
# https://winvector.github.io/vtreat/.
#
# A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
#
# @Manual{,
# title = {vtreat: A Statistically Sound 'data.frame' Processor/Conditioner},
# author = {John Mount and Nina Zumel},
# year = {2024},
# note = {https://github.com/WinVector/vtreat/, https://winvector.github.io/vtreat/},
# }
A small categorical example.
# categorical example
set.seed(23525)
# we set up our raw training and application data
<- data.frame(
dTrainC x = c('a', 'a', 'a', 'b', 'b', NA, NA),
z = c(1, 2, 3, 4, NA, 6, NA),
y = c(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE))
<- data.frame(
dTestC x = c('a', 'b', 'c', NA),
z = c(10, 20, 30, NA))
# we perform a vtreat cross frame experiment
# and unpack the results into treatmentsC
# and dTrainCTreated
unpack[= treatments,
treatmentsC = crossFrame
dTrainCTreated <- mkCrossFrameCExperiment(
] dframe = dTrainC,
varlist = setdiff(colnames(dTrainC), 'y'),
outcomename = 'y',
outcometarget = TRUE,
verbose = FALSE)
# the treatments include a score frame relating new
# derived variables to original columns
$scoreFrame[, c('origName', 'varName', 'code', 'rsq', 'sig', 'extraModelDegrees', 'recommended')] %.>%
treatmentsC::kable(.) knitr
origName | varName | code | rsq | sig | extraModelDegrees | recommended |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | x_catP | catP | 0.1669568 | 0.2064389 | 2 | FALSE |
x | x_catB | catB | 0.2547883 | 0.1185814 | 2 | TRUE |
z | z | clean | 0.2376018 | 0.1317602 | 0 | TRUE |
z | z_isBAD | isBAD | 0.2960654 | 0.0924840 | 0 | TRUE |
x | x_lev_NA | lev | 0.2960654 | 0.0924840 | 0 | FALSE |
x | x_lev_x_a | lev | 0.1300057 | 0.2649038 | 0 | FALSE |
x | x_lev_x_b | lev | 0.0060673 | 0.8096724 | 0 | FALSE |
# the treated frame is a "cross frame" which
# is a transform of the training data built
# as if the treatment were learned on a different
# disjoint training set to avoid nested model
# bias and over-fit.
%.>%
dTrainCTreated head(.) %.>%
::kable(.) knitr
x_catP | x_catB | z | z_isBAD | x_lev_NA | x_lev_x_a | x_lev_x_b | y |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.50 | 0.0000000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | FALSE |
0.40 | -0.4054484 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | FALSE |
0.40 | -10.3089860 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | TRUE |
0.20 | 8.8049919 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | FALSE |
0.25 | -9.2104404 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | TRUE |
0.25 | 9.2104404 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | TRUE |
# Any future application data is prepared with
# the prepare method.
<- prepare(treatmentsC, dTestC, pruneSig=NULL)
dTestCTreated
%.>%
dTestCTreated head(.) %.>%
::kable(.) knitr
x_catP | x_catB | z | z_isBAD | x_lev_NA | x_lev_x_a | x_lev_x_b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.4285714 | -0.9807709 | 10.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0.2857143 | -0.2876737 | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0.0714286 | 0.0000000 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.2857143 | 9.6158638 | 3.2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
A small numeric example.
# numeric example
set.seed(23525)
# we set up our raw training and application data
<- data.frame(
dTrainN x = c('a', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'b', 'b', NA, NA),
z = c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA, 7, NA),
y = c(0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1))
<- data.frame(
dTestN x = c('a', 'b', 'c', NA),
z = c(10, 20, 30, NA))
# we perform a vtreat cross frame experiment
# and unpack the results into treatmentsN
# and dTrainNTreated
unpack[= treatments,
treatmentsN = crossFrame
dTrainNTreated <- mkCrossFrameNExperiment(
] dframe = dTrainN,
varlist = setdiff(colnames(dTrainN), 'y'),
outcomename = 'y',
verbose = FALSE)
# the treatments include a score frame relating new
# derived variables to original columns
$scoreFrame[, c('origName', 'varName', 'code', 'rsq', 'sig', 'extraModelDegrees')] %.>%
treatmentsN::kable(.) knitr
origName | varName | code | rsq | sig | extraModelDegrees |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | x_catP | catP | 0.4047085 | 0.0899406 | 2 |
x | x_catN | catN | 0.2822908 | 0.1753958 | 2 |
x | x_catD | catD | 0.0209693 | 0.7322571 | 2 |
z | z | clean | 0.2880952 | 0.1701892 | 0 |
z | z_isBAD | isBAD | 0.3333333 | 0.1339746 | 0 |
x | x_lev_NA | lev | 0.3333333 | 0.1339746 | 0 |
x | x_lev_x_a | lev | 0.2500000 | 0.2070312 | 0 |
# the treated frame is a "cross frame" which
# is a transform of the training data built
# as if the treatment were learned on a different
# disjoint training set to avoid nested model
# bias and over-fit.
%.>%
dTrainNTreated head(.) %.>%
::kable(.) knitr
x_catN | x_catD | z | z_isBAD | x_lev_NA | x_lev_x_a | x_catP | y |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.2666667 | 0.5000000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.6 | 0 |
-0.5000000 | 0.0000000 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 |
-0.0666667 | 0.5000000 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.6 | 0 |
-0.5000000 | 0.0000000 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
0.4000000 | 0.7071068 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 |
-0.4000000 | 0.7071068 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 1 |
# Any future application data is prepared with
# the prepare method.
<- prepare(treatmentsN, dTestN, pruneSig=NULL)
dTestNTreated
%.>%
dTestNTreated head(.) %.>%
::kable(.) knitr
x_catP | x_catN | x_catD | z | z_isBAD | x_lev_NA | x_lev_x_a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5000 | -0.25 | 0.5000000 | 10.000000 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0.2500 | 0.00 | 0.7071068 | 20.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.0625 | 0.00 | 0.7071068 | 30.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.2500 | 0.50 | 0.0000000 | 3.666667 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Related work:
To install, from inside R
please run:
install.packages("vtreat")
Notes on controlling vtreat
’s cross-validation plans can
be found here.
Note: vtreat
is meant only for “tame names”, that is:
variables and column names that are also valid simple (without
quotes) R
variables names.